Conservation Businesses and Conservation Planning in a Biological Diversity Hotspot
Identifieur interne : 002F27 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 002F26; suivant : 002F28Conservation Businesses and Conservation Planning in a Biological Diversity Hotspot
Auteurs : Enrico Di Minin [Finlande, Royaume-Uni] ; Douglas Craig Macmillan [Royaume-Uni] ; Peter Styan Goodman [Afrique du Sud] ; Boyd Escott [Afrique du Sud] ; Rob Slotow [Afrique du Sud] ; Atte Moilanen [Finlande]Source :
- Conservation Biology [ 0888-8892 ] ; 2013-08.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- African province, Alternative land, Alternative plans, Aylward lutz, Biodiversity, Biodiversity conservation, Biological conservation, Biological diversity, Biological diversity conservation, Biological diversity hotspot, Biological diversity protection, Biological diversity supply, Biology, Central component, Commercial forestry, Commodity prices, Connectivity, Connectivity values, Conservaci, Conservation, Conservation action, Conservation biology, Conservation biology knight, Conservation biology volume, Conservation businesses, Conservation features, Conservation opportunities, Conservation opportunity, Conservation planning, Conservation plans, Conservation prioritization, Conservation return, Conservation value, Considerable conflict, Cowling, Current network, Current patterns, Desarrollo sustentable, Development goals, Development interests, Diversidad biol, Diversity, Durrell institute, Ecology, Economic benefits, Economic costs, Economic development, Economic features, Economic return, Economic returns, Economic value, Ecosystem, Ecosystem services, Ecotourism, Environmental attributes, Ezemvelo wildlife, Faith walker, Financial benefits, Finnish centre, Forestry, Further opportunities, Future threats, Goodman, Grid, Grid cells, Gross revenue, Hierarchical analysis, Hotspot, Human population density, Importancia para, Individual land, Input grid, Input grids, Invasive plants, Investment period, Irrigated, Knight cowling, Large extents, Latter case, Limited conservation resources, Local stakeholders, Lombard, Management costs, Metapopulation biology, Moilanen, Naidoo, Naidoo ricketts, National academy, Natural capital, Opportunity costs, Other land, Para, Performance curves, Pietermaritzburg, Pinus elliottii, Pinus taeda, Planning figure, Planning region, Polasky, Policy makers, Polygon, Postprocessing analyses, Potential policy conflicts, Poverty relief, Prioritization, Prioritization scenarios, Priority areas, Priority conservation areas, Public library, Road development, Science biology, Social dimensions, Socioeconomic data, Spatial maps, Spatial models, Spatial overlap, Spatial prioritization, Spatial resolution, Study area, Sustainable, Sustainable development, Sustainable levels, Unit area, Unsustainable resource, Urban spread, Vegetation types, Zonation.
- Teeft :
- African province, Alternative land, Alternative plans, Aylward lutz, Biodiversity, Biodiversity conservation, Biological conservation, Biological diversity, Biological diversity conservation, Biological diversity hotspot, Biological diversity protection, Biological diversity supply, Biology, Central component, Commercial forestry, Commodity prices, Connectivity, Connectivity values, Conservaci, Conservation, Conservation action, Conservation biology, Conservation biology knight, Conservation biology volume, Conservation businesses, Conservation features, Conservation opportunities, Conservation opportunity, Conservation planning, Conservation plans, Conservation prioritization, Conservation return, Conservation value, Considerable conflict, Cowling, Current network, Current patterns, Desarrollo sustentable, Development goals, Development interests, Diversidad biol, Diversity, Durrell institute, Ecology, Economic benefits, Economic costs, Economic development, Economic features, Economic return, Economic returns, Economic value, Ecosystem, Ecosystem services, Ecotourism, Environmental attributes, Ezemvelo wildlife, Faith walker, Financial benefits, Finnish centre, Forestry, Further opportunities, Future threats, Goodman, Grid, Grid cells, Gross revenue, Hierarchical analysis, Hotspot, Human population density, Importancia para, Individual land, Input grid, Input grids, Invasive plants, Investment period, Irrigated, Knight cowling, Large extents, Latter case, Limited conservation resources, Local stakeholders, Lombard, Management costs, Metapopulation biology, Moilanen, Naidoo, Naidoo ricketts, National academy, Natural capital, Opportunity costs, Other land, Para, Performance curves, Pietermaritzburg, Pinus elliottii, Pinus taeda, Planning figure, Planning region, Polasky, Policy makers, Polygon, Postprocessing analyses, Potential policy conflicts, Poverty relief, Prioritization, Prioritization scenarios, Priority areas, Priority conservation areas, Public library, Road development, Science biology, Social dimensions, Socioeconomic data, Spatial maps, Spatial models, Spatial overlap, Spatial prioritization, Spatial resolution, Study area, Sustainable, Sustainable development, Sustainable levels, Unit area, Unsustainable resource, Urban spread, Vegetation types, Zonation.
Abstract
The allocation of land to biological diversity conservation competes with other land uses and the needs of society for development, food, and extraction of natural resources. Trade‐offs between biological diversity conservation and alternative land uses are unavoidable, given the realities of limited conservation resources and the competing demands of society. We developed a conservation‐planning assessment for the South African province of KwaZulu‐Natal, which forms the central component of the Maputaland–Pondoland–Albany biological diversity hotspot. Our objective was to enhance biological diversity protection while promoting sustainable development and providing spatial guidance in the resolution of potential policy conflicts over priority areas for conservation at risk of transformation. The conservation‐planning assessment combined spatial‐distribution models for 646 conservation features, spatial economic‐return models for 28 alternative land uses, and spatial maps for 4 threats. Nature‐based tourism businesses were competitive with other land uses and could provide revenues of >US$60 million/year to local stakeholders and simultaneously help meeting conservation goals for almost half the conservation features in the planning region. Accounting for opportunity costs substantially decreased conflicts between biological diversity, agricultural use, commercial forestry, and mining. Accounting for economic benefits arising from conservation and reducing potential policy conflicts with alternative plans for development can provide opportunities for successful strategies that combine conservation and sustainable development and facilitate conservation action. Negocios de Conservación y Planificación de la Conservación en un Sitio de Importancia para la Biodiversidad
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12048
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000F63
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000F63
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000326
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 002F40
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 002F27
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Conservation Businesses and Conservation Planning in a Biological Diversity Hotspot</title><author><name sortKey="Di Minin, Enrico" sort="Di Minin, Enrico" uniqKey="Di Minin E" first="Enrico" last="Di Minin">Enrico Di Minin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Macmillan, Douglas Craig" sort="Macmillan, Douglas Craig" uniqKey="Macmillan D" first="Douglas Craig" last="Macmillan">Douglas Craig Macmillan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Goodman, Peter Styan" sort="Goodman, Peter Styan" uniqKey="Goodman P" first="Peter Styan" last="Goodman">Peter Styan Goodman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Escott, Boyd" sort="Escott, Boyd" uniqKey="Escott B" first="Boyd" last="Escott">Boyd Escott</name></author><author><name sortKey="Slotow, Rob" sort="Slotow, Rob" uniqKey="Slotow R" first="Rob" last="Slotow">Rob Slotow</name></author><author><name sortKey="Moilanen, Atte" sort="Moilanen, Atte" uniqKey="Moilanen A" first="Atte" last="Moilanen">Atte Moilanen</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:313092DB5E63048FAF8D7DC260F2D697E723C84D</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/cobi.12048</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/313092DB5E63048FAF8D7DC260F2D697E723C84D/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000F63</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000F63</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000F63</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000326</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000326</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0888-8892:2013:Di Minin E:conservation:businesses:and</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">002F40</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002F27</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">002F27</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Conservation Businesses and Conservation Planning in a Biological Diversity Hotspot</title><author><name sortKey="Di Minin, Enrico" sort="Di Minin, Enrico" uniqKey="Di Minin E" first="Enrico" last="Di Minin">Enrico Di Minin</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Finlande</country></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Anthropology and Conservation, Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, University of Kent, CT2 7NR, Canterbury</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Canterbury</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="4"><country xml:lang="fr">Finlande</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Biosciences, Finnish Centre of Excellence in Metapopulation Biology, P.O. Box 65, FI‐00014 University of Helsinki</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Helsinki</settlement><region type="région" nuts="2">Uusimaa</region></placeName><orgName type="university">Université d'Helsinki</orgName></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="4"><country xml:lang="fr">Finlande</country><wicri:regionArea>Current Address: Department of Biosciences, Finnish Centre of Excellence in Metapopulation Biology, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65FI‐00014</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université d'Helsinki</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Helsinki</settlement><region type="région" nuts="2">Uusimaa</region></placeName></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Finlande</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Macmillan, Douglas Craig" sort="Macmillan, Douglas Craig" uniqKey="Macmillan D" first="Douglas Craig" last="Macmillan">Douglas Craig Macmillan</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Anthropology and Conservation, Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, University of Kent, CT2 7NR, Canterbury</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Canterbury</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Goodman, Peter Styan" sort="Goodman, Peter Styan" uniqKey="Goodman P" first="Peter Styan" last="Goodman">Peter Styan Goodman</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Afrique du Sud</country><wicri:regionArea>Biodiversity Information Reporting and Management Division, Ezemvelo KwaZulu‐Natal Wildlife, P.O. Box 13053, 3202, Cascades</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Cascades</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Escott, Boyd" sort="Escott, Boyd" uniqKey="Escott B" first="Boyd" last="Escott">Boyd Escott</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Afrique du Sud</country><wicri:regionArea>Biodiversity Information Reporting and Management Division, Ezemvelo KwaZulu‐Natal Wildlife, P.O. Box 13053, 3202, Cascades</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Cascades</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Slotow, Rob" sort="Slotow, Rob" uniqKey="Slotow R" first="Rob" last="Slotow">Rob Slotow</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Afrique du Sud</country><wicri:regionArea>Amarula Elephant Research Programme, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu‐Natal, 4041, Durban</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Durban</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Moilanen, Atte" sort="Moilanen, Atte" uniqKey="Moilanen A" first="Atte" last="Moilanen">Atte Moilanen</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><country xml:lang="fr">Finlande</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Biosciences, Finnish Centre of Excellence in Metapopulation Biology, P.O. Box 65, FI‐00014 University of Helsinki</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Helsinki</settlement><region type="région" nuts="2">Uusimaa</region></placeName><orgName type="university">Université d'Helsinki</orgName></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Conservation Biology</title><title level="j" type="alt">CONSERVATION BIOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0888-8892</idno><idno type="eISSN">1523-1739</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">27</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="808">808</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="820">820</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">13</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-08">2013-08</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0888-8892</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0888-8892</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>African province</term><term>Alternative land</term><term>Alternative plans</term><term>Aylward lutz</term><term>Biodiversity</term><term>Biodiversity conservation</term><term>Biological conservation</term><term>Biological diversity</term><term>Biological diversity conservation</term><term>Biological diversity hotspot</term><term>Biological diversity protection</term><term>Biological diversity supply</term><term>Biology</term><term>Central component</term><term>Commercial forestry</term><term>Commodity prices</term><term>Connectivity</term><term>Connectivity values</term><term>Conservaci</term><term>Conservation</term><term>Conservation action</term><term>Conservation biology</term><term>Conservation biology knight</term><term>Conservation biology volume</term><term>Conservation businesses</term><term>Conservation features</term><term>Conservation opportunities</term><term>Conservation opportunity</term><term>Conservation planning</term><term>Conservation plans</term><term>Conservation prioritization</term><term>Conservation return</term><term>Conservation value</term><term>Considerable conflict</term><term>Cowling</term><term>Current network</term><term>Current patterns</term><term>Desarrollo sustentable</term><term>Development goals</term><term>Development interests</term><term>Diversidad biol</term><term>Diversity</term><term>Durrell institute</term><term>Ecology</term><term>Economic benefits</term><term>Economic costs</term><term>Economic development</term><term>Economic features</term><term>Economic return</term><term>Economic returns</term><term>Economic value</term><term>Ecosystem</term><term>Ecosystem services</term><term>Ecotourism</term><term>Environmental attributes</term><term>Ezemvelo wildlife</term><term>Faith walker</term><term>Financial benefits</term><term>Finnish centre</term><term>Forestry</term><term>Further opportunities</term><term>Future threats</term><term>Goodman</term><term>Grid</term><term>Grid cells</term><term>Gross revenue</term><term>Hierarchical analysis</term><term>Hotspot</term><term>Human population density</term><term>Importancia para</term><term>Individual land</term><term>Input grid</term><term>Input grids</term><term>Invasive plants</term><term>Investment period</term><term>Irrigated</term><term>Knight cowling</term><term>Large extents</term><term>Latter case</term><term>Limited conservation resources</term><term>Local stakeholders</term><term>Lombard</term><term>Management costs</term><term>Metapopulation biology</term><term>Moilanen</term><term>Naidoo</term><term>Naidoo ricketts</term><term>National academy</term><term>Natural capital</term><term>Opportunity costs</term><term>Other land</term><term>Para</term><term>Performance curves</term><term>Pietermaritzburg</term><term>Pinus elliottii</term><term>Pinus taeda</term><term>Planning figure</term><term>Planning region</term><term>Polasky</term><term>Policy makers</term><term>Polygon</term><term>Postprocessing analyses</term><term>Potential policy conflicts</term><term>Poverty relief</term><term>Prioritization</term><term>Prioritization scenarios</term><term>Priority areas</term><term>Priority conservation areas</term><term>Public library</term><term>Road development</term><term>Science biology</term><term>Social dimensions</term><term>Socioeconomic data</term><term>Spatial maps</term><term>Spatial models</term><term>Spatial overlap</term><term>Spatial prioritization</term><term>Spatial resolution</term><term>Study area</term><term>Sustainable</term><term>Sustainable development</term><term>Sustainable levels</term><term>Unit area</term><term>Unsustainable resource</term><term>Urban spread</term><term>Vegetation types</term><term>Zonation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>African province</term><term>Alternative land</term><term>Alternative plans</term><term>Aylward lutz</term><term>Biodiversity</term><term>Biodiversity conservation</term><term>Biological conservation</term><term>Biological diversity</term><term>Biological diversity conservation</term><term>Biological diversity hotspot</term><term>Biological diversity protection</term><term>Biological diversity supply</term><term>Biology</term><term>Central component</term><term>Commercial forestry</term><term>Commodity prices</term><term>Connectivity</term><term>Connectivity values</term><term>Conservaci</term><term>Conservation</term><term>Conservation action</term><term>Conservation biology</term><term>Conservation biology knight</term><term>Conservation biology volume</term><term>Conservation businesses</term><term>Conservation features</term><term>Conservation opportunities</term><term>Conservation opportunity</term><term>Conservation planning</term><term>Conservation plans</term><term>Conservation prioritization</term><term>Conservation return</term><term>Conservation value</term><term>Considerable conflict</term><term>Cowling</term><term>Current network</term><term>Current patterns</term><term>Desarrollo sustentable</term><term>Development goals</term><term>Development interests</term><term>Diversidad biol</term><term>Diversity</term><term>Durrell institute</term><term>Ecology</term><term>Economic benefits</term><term>Economic costs</term><term>Economic development</term><term>Economic features</term><term>Economic return</term><term>Economic returns</term><term>Economic value</term><term>Ecosystem</term><term>Ecosystem services</term><term>Ecotourism</term><term>Environmental attributes</term><term>Ezemvelo wildlife</term><term>Faith walker</term><term>Financial benefits</term><term>Finnish centre</term><term>Forestry</term><term>Further opportunities</term><term>Future threats</term><term>Goodman</term><term>Grid</term><term>Grid cells</term><term>Gross revenue</term><term>Hierarchical analysis</term><term>Hotspot</term><term>Human population density</term><term>Importancia para</term><term>Individual land</term><term>Input grid</term><term>Input grids</term><term>Invasive plants</term><term>Investment period</term><term>Irrigated</term><term>Knight cowling</term><term>Large extents</term><term>Latter case</term><term>Limited conservation resources</term><term>Local stakeholders</term><term>Lombard</term><term>Management costs</term><term>Metapopulation biology</term><term>Moilanen</term><term>Naidoo</term><term>Naidoo ricketts</term><term>National academy</term><term>Natural capital</term><term>Opportunity costs</term><term>Other land</term><term>Para</term><term>Performance curves</term><term>Pietermaritzburg</term><term>Pinus elliottii</term><term>Pinus taeda</term><term>Planning figure</term><term>Planning region</term><term>Polasky</term><term>Policy makers</term><term>Polygon</term><term>Postprocessing analyses</term><term>Potential policy conflicts</term><term>Poverty relief</term><term>Prioritization</term><term>Prioritization scenarios</term><term>Priority areas</term><term>Priority conservation areas</term><term>Public library</term><term>Road development</term><term>Science biology</term><term>Social dimensions</term><term>Socioeconomic data</term><term>Spatial maps</term><term>Spatial models</term><term>Spatial overlap</term><term>Spatial prioritization</term><term>Spatial resolution</term><term>Study area</term><term>Sustainable</term><term>Sustainable development</term><term>Sustainable levels</term><term>Unit area</term><term>Unsustainable resource</term><term>Urban spread</term><term>Vegetation types</term><term>Zonation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Biodiversité</term><term>Biologie</term><term>écologie</term><term>Développement économique</term><term>Valeur économique</term><term>écosystème</term><term>Bibliothèque publique</term><term>Développement durable</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The allocation of land to biological diversity conservation competes with other land uses and the needs of society for development, food, and extraction of natural resources. Trade‐offs between biological diversity conservation and alternative land uses are unavoidable, given the realities of limited conservation resources and the competing demands of society. We developed a conservation‐planning assessment for the South African province of KwaZulu‐Natal, which forms the central component of the Maputaland–Pondoland–Albany biological diversity hotspot. Our objective was to enhance biological diversity protection while promoting sustainable development and providing spatial guidance in the resolution of potential policy conflicts over priority areas for conservation at risk of transformation. The conservation‐planning assessment combined spatial‐distribution models for 646 conservation features, spatial economic‐return models for 28 alternative land uses, and spatial maps for 4 threats. Nature‐based tourism businesses were competitive with other land uses and could provide revenues of >US$60 million/year to local stakeholders and simultaneously help meeting conservation goals for almost half the conservation features in the planning region. Accounting for opportunity costs substantially decreased conflicts between biological diversity, agricultural use, commercial forestry, and mining. Accounting for economic benefits arising from conservation and reducing potential policy conflicts with alternative plans for development can provide opportunities for successful strategies that combine conservation and sustainable development and facilitate conservation action. Negocios de Conservación y Planificación de la Conservación en un Sitio de Importancia para la Biodiversidad</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Afrique du Sud</li><li>Finlande</li><li>Royaume-Uni</li></country><region><li>Uusimaa</li></region><settlement><li>Helsinki</li></settlement><orgName><li>Université d'Helsinki</li></orgName></list><tree><country name="Finlande"><noRegion><name sortKey="Di Minin, Enrico" sort="Di Minin, Enrico" uniqKey="Di Minin E" first="Enrico" last="Di Minin">Enrico Di Minin</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Di Minin, Enrico" sort="Di Minin, Enrico" uniqKey="Di Minin E" first="Enrico" last="Di Minin">Enrico Di Minin</name><name sortKey="Di Minin, Enrico" sort="Di Minin, Enrico" uniqKey="Di Minin E" first="Enrico" last="Di Minin">Enrico Di Minin</name><name sortKey="Di Minin, Enrico" sort="Di Minin, Enrico" uniqKey="Di Minin E" first="Enrico" last="Di Minin">Enrico Di Minin</name><name sortKey="Moilanen, Atte" sort="Moilanen, Atte" uniqKey="Moilanen A" first="Atte" last="Moilanen">Atte Moilanen</name></country><country name="Royaume-Uni"><noRegion><name sortKey="Di Minin, Enrico" sort="Di Minin, Enrico" uniqKey="Di Minin E" first="Enrico" last="Di Minin">Enrico Di Minin</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Macmillan, Douglas Craig" sort="Macmillan, Douglas Craig" uniqKey="Macmillan D" first="Douglas Craig" last="Macmillan">Douglas Craig Macmillan</name></country><country name="Afrique du Sud"><noRegion><name sortKey="Goodman, Peter Styan" sort="Goodman, Peter Styan" uniqKey="Goodman P" first="Peter Styan" last="Goodman">Peter Styan Goodman</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Escott, Boyd" sort="Escott, Boyd" uniqKey="Escott B" first="Boyd" last="Escott">Boyd Escott</name><name sortKey="Slotow, Rob" sort="Slotow, Rob" uniqKey="Slotow R" first="Rob" last="Slotow">Rob Slotow</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/SidaSubSaharaV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002F27 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 002F27 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= SidaSubSaharaV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:313092DB5E63048FAF8D7DC260F2D697E723C84D
|texte= Conservation Businesses and Conservation Planning in a Biological Diversity Hotspot
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |